Archive for the Stunning Jewelry Category

nothing says “elegance” like this.

Posted in 7677537, Brand Name, Stunning Jewelry, audrey hepburn, classic jewelry, fashion trends, paspaley pearls with tags , , , , on June 11, 2008 by jewelryblogger

to me, the epitomy of simple elegance is a strand of pearls.  not just any strand of pearls, mind you… the highest quality, meticulously crafted kind.  the woman who wears them doesn’t need to say a word.  she can glide into a room and all eyes will be on her.  she’s not trying to be sophisticated, feminine, perfectly stylish.  she just is.

these Paspaley pearls are perfection.  Paspaley is the world’s leading source of South Sea pearls, and uses the largest and rarest pearl creating oyster: the Pinctada maxima.  the strand makers use an extremely discerning eye while matching their pearls to create each piece.  you never see knots between Paspaley pearls because they pioneered a special stringing technique that keeps the look clean and polished.

Stuller & Paspaley is where i go for my pearls.  the choices and quality are unmatched.  i have to say, wearing a string of pearls is this amazing combination of unexpected yet completely and utterly natural.  it’s the most classic thing a girl can wear on her body aside from the little black dress.  wearing both together?  as What Not to Wear’s Stacy London would say, “shut up!”

check out http://southseapearl.biz/index.aspx?c=23500

“absolutely astonishing”

Posted in Brand Name, Pendants, Silver Jewelry, Stunning Jewelry, Uncategorized with tags , , , , on June 9, 2008 by jewelryblogger

accordiInterlocking Circles Pendantng to Tiffany & Co., and I could not agree more…
this beautiful piece is the Tiffany 1837 Interlocking Circles Pendant in sterling. at $175 it’s not cheap–but for Tiffany, it’s very reasonable. this pendant comes with a 16″ chain. on my “have-to-have-it” list… i’m tired of the traditional tiffany’s necklaces that you see every girl wearing- the hearts that drape off of a chain.  they’re pretty, don’t get me wrong, but i’d rather make a statement than blend in.  there’s something powerful about these two rings bound together permanently.  they both have room to move, but they never move too far from each other, and they always touch.  a nice analogy for love, isn’t it?